How should I review LSAT practice questions?
How to review LSAT practice questions (the part that actually moves the score)
Last updated
If you change one thing about how you study, change this. Reviewing questions properly is the highest-return activity in LSAT prep, and it is the one almost everyone under-does — because it is slow, uncomfortable, and does not feel like progress the way a fresh set does.
Checking the key is not reviewing
Reading the correct answer and thinking "oh, right" produces the feeling of understanding without any of it. You are recognizing a solution someone else supplied, which is a different mental act from producing one, and it does not transfer to the next question.
The test of real review is simple: could you now explain, to someone else, why the credited answer is correct AND why each of the other four was written? If not, you have not reviewed it.
What to write for every miss
- What the argument's conclusion and evidence were, in your own words. Most misses trace back to misreading one of them.
- Why the credited answer is right — the specific thing that makes it work, not a paraphrase of it.
- Why YOUR answer was wrong. This is the important one. Not "it was out of scope" but the actual reason you found it attractive.
- What the wrong answer was built to catch. Reversal, extreme wording, right-idea-wrong-part, true-but-irrelevant. Naming the trap is what makes it recognizable next time.
- One sentence you could apply to a question you have not seen yet. If the lesson only applies to this item, you have not extracted it.
Writing matters here. A lesson you think is a lesson you will lose; a lesson you write is one you can be held to. It also exposes the ones that dissolve the moment you try to put them into words, which are the ones that were never lessons.
Blind review
The community-standard method, and it is worth the extra time. Do a timed set, flagging anything you were not certain about, and do not look at the answers. Then go back to every flagged question and re-solve it with no clock at all, taking as long as you need to commit to a choice.
Only then grade both passes. The gap between them tells you something no single score can: questions you got right untimed but wrong timed are a PACING problem, and questions you got wrong both times are a KNOWLEDGE problem. Those need opposite responses, and without splitting them you cannot tell which you have.
Review the ones you got right
At least the ones you were unsure about. A correct answer reached by a wrong route is a miss that has not happened yet, and it will happen on a day when the wrong route leads somewhere else. If you picked it because the other four felt worse, that is a guess with a good outcome, not a solved question.
Sources
Counsel is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Law School Admission Council. LSAC publishes the authoritative description of the LSAT; where this page and LSAC disagree, LSAC is right.