Should I take a gap year before law school?
Should you take a gap year before law school?
Last updated
Going straight through from college is no longer the default path, and taking time first is no longer something you have to explain. The question is what you would do with it, because that is what determines whether it helps.
What time genuinely buys
- A better LSAT score, for many people. Studying properly is a second job, and it is far easier to do well when it is not competing with a full course load and a thesis.
- A stronger application overall. Real work produces a resume with substance, a recommender who has watched you handle responsibility, and usually a personal statement with something in it.
- Certainty. Time around working adults — ideally including lawyers — is the cheapest way to find out whether you actually want this before committing three years and a large sum.
- Savings, which change what debt you can accept and therefore which offers you can take.
What it costs
A year of a lawyer's earnings at the end of your career, in the crude arithmetic — you finish a year later and retire at the same age. That is the honest cost and it is not nothing.
The subtler cost is drift. A year becomes three, momentum goes, and the thing that was a deliberate plan turns into a deferral. If you take time, it helps to decide in advance what would tell you it is time to apply.
The LSAT rule that shapes the timing
This is generous enough that a couple of years off is not a problem — a score taken in college will still be reportable. But it caps the useful lead time, and it interacts with the take limits: an attempt spent early, on a score that later ages out, has cost you twice.
The practical read: taking the LSAT during or just after college and then applying within a few years is safe. Taking it speculatively years before you are sure is not, and the safer version is to take it when you have decided.
What to do with the time
Almost anything demanding, done well, beats a prestigious-sounding thing done passively. Committees are not scoring the job title; they are looking for evidence that you handle responsibility and stick with difficult work. A recommender who can describe that is worth more than an impressive employer who cannot.
Paralegal and legal-adjacent work has one specific advantage over other options: it answers the question of whether you like the actual work. That is worth a great deal more than it appears on a resume.
Use the time to read those, for the schools you are considering. Doing it while you are not also writing applications is the version where you actually take the numbers seriously.
Sources
Counsel is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Law School Admission Council. LSAC publishes the authoritative description of the LSAT; where this page and LSAC disagree, LSAC is right.